Rights & wrongs of an IP protection acceleration strategy in Europe

Person pointing at sticky notes on a glass wall during a meeting or brainstorming session, with light reflections and a window in the background.

In this second blog post part of our mini-series on the rights and wrongs of an IP protection acceleration strategy, we are exploring what options applicants have at their disposal in Europe.

The European Patent Office (EPO) offers two distinct schemes for speeding up patent prosecution – the Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) and the Program for Accelerated Prosecution of European Patent Applications (PACE).

PACE #

The PACE procedure is only provided by the EPO when ‘practically feasible’, and is subject to the workload of the relevant searching and examining divisions. As such, the expedition speed may be affected by the number of PACE requests made in a given technical field or by a given applicant.

PACE acceleration can only be requested once for each stage, namely, one PACE request is allowed for accelerated search, and one PACE request is allowed for accelerated examination. PACE requests are not published and are excluded from public inspection.

Applicants should note that diligence is required, as failure to respond to examination reports in a timely manner will result in the application being removed from the PACE scheme. If PACE status is lost for any reason (for example, by requesting an extension of time for response to an examination report or if maintenance fees are not paid in a timely manner) it cannot be requested again in that stage.

There is no official fee for requesting PACE handling.

If a request is made for early search, the EPO will aim to search an application as soon as possible. However, accelerated search may not be possible in certain circumstances, such as when the claims are filed later than the rest of the application.

Publication #

While it is possible to request early publication of a European patent application, publication may not occur for up to five months after the request is received.

Examination #

Accelerated examination can be requested in writing at any time after the Examining Division has taken responsibility for the application. An examination report will normally be issued by the EPO within about 3 months after the request for acceleration of the substantive examination has been made, provided that all necessary earlier procedural steps have been completed. The EPO aims to issue any subsequent examination communications within 3 months after a response is received.

If accelerated examination is requested, it is necessary to file any responses to the examination reports without requesting extensions of time, in order to maintain the expedited examination process. If any extensions of time or further processing are used, PACE status will be lost and cannot be regained.

Do

  • Consider PACE if examination has already begun
  • Review whether it is in your best interest to expedite prosecution, for example, the earlier your patent application is published the earlier the technology is in the public domain

Don't

  • Miss deadlines for response or request extensions of time as PACE acceleration cannot be regained for a stage once lost
  • Rely on PACE acceleration as a guarantee to speed up protection

Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) #

The PPH is an initiative operated by a group of Patent Offices around the world. It allows the examination work product from one participating Patent Office to be re-used by another participating Patent Office, providing applicants with a means of accelerating examination. To apply for PPH at the UKIPO or EPO, the same case must have been allowed or granted by another participating Patent Office.

If the applicant has a patent that has been granted by one Patent Office in the scheme, examination of a corresponding patent application at another Patent Office can be completed more quickly, as the first Patent Office has already done much of the work.

In the UK, a positive examination report from the Austrian, Australian, Canadian, Chinese, German, Danish, Estonian, Spanish, Finnish, Hungarian, Israeli, Icelandic, Japanese, Korean, Mexican, Norwegian, Portuguese, Russian, Swedish, Singaporean or US patent office can be used to accelerate examination of a corresponding UK application.

At the EPO, a positive examination report from the Canadian, Chinese, Israeli, Japanese, Korean, Mexican, Singaporean or US patent office, or a positive report from one of those offices in their capacity as an International Search or Examination Authority can be used to accelerate examination of a corresponding European application.

Applicants should note that PPH may not be desirable if the later Examining Patent Office is one that would be expected to take a more liberal view during examination than the earlier Patent Office. In such cases, using PPH is likely to result in a narrower scope of patent protection at the later Patent Office than might have been available through normal examination.

There is no fee for using the PPH at the UKIPO or EPO, although applicants should note that:

  • Examination must not have begun;
  • The claim set must correspond in scope, or be narrower than, the allowed or granted claims; and
  • At least one claim must have been found to be allowable by the first Patent Office.

If PPH is requested, the EPO will normally handle the application with at least a level of acceleration corresponding to the PACE program.

Do

  • Consider PPH if you have a granted patent in another territory
  • Review whether the amendments made in the granted patent may raise added matter or other objections in Europe
  • Consider whether the granted patent encountered prior art that wouldn’t be citable in Europe

Don't

  • Apply for PPH if examination has already begun
  • Forget to review whether a broader scope of protection may be achieved under standard examination

If you require any further information or assistance in connection with your intellectual property or the intellectual property of your business then please contact Murgitroyd.

The logo of the Financial Times features the bold initials "FT" in black on a beige background, with "Financial Times" written below in dark blue.
"IP STARS logo featuring bold dark blue text with a star in the letter 'A,' and yellow 'from Managing IP' text below, on a white background."
Logo displaying the text 'Legal500' in a large serif font.
The SIAAM 300 logo features three red horizontal lines next to bold black and red text, with a minimalist design highlighting the brand name.
Logo with three stacked red rounded bars on the left and a large red M on the right against a white background.
Design resembling the IAM 1000 rating badge featuring the name Murgitroyd, recommended for 2025, on a gray background with bold black and red text.
WTR 1000 logo with blue and black text and beige horizontal lines on a transparent background.
Logo featuring the words "LEXULOGY" and "INDEX" with a design of six dark circles arranged in two columns on the left side.
A round badge with a white interior and gold border, featuring a gold eagle emblem, Chinese characters on a red ribbon, and the text "2024" at the bottom.
The Déla Marken logo features three black stars with shooting lines inside a red circle and the words "DÉCIDEURS MAGAZINE" in bold black and red text below.
Logo for WIPR 2024 featuring the word "Diversity" and the phrase "Influential Woman in IP" on a teal background.
LBG logo featuring a purple circle with white text, alongside "Legal Benchmarking" and "Social Impact Awards 2024" in black and orange text.
A colorful icon with six petal-like shapes in blue, purple, green, and orange surrounding a central circle, with "IP INCLUSIVE" text and a tagline about diversity and inclusion.
A logo with interconnected circles forming a stylized design, accompanied by the text "ADAPT.legal" beneath it.
European Patent Pipeline Program (EPPP) logo with bold pink and dark blue text on a gray background.
Logo for the Legal Sustainability Alliance featuring the acronym "LSA" with leaf and wave designs, and text indicating membership for 2024.
A badge with a blue background, white text reads "Cyber Essentials Certified" with a green checkmark and a stylized checkmark graphic.
Cyber Essentials Plus logo with a blue and green checkmark next to the text on a dark background.
A stylized swoosh design in blue, green, and yellow colors with the text "bvea" and the tagline "invested in a better future" beneath it.
Green globe with swirling lines next to the text "United Kingdom Best Managed Companies" in black.
WIPR Rankings logo with blue letters, a light-blue 'Rankings' badge and gold-gradient 'Highly Recommended Firm' beside 'UK Patents 2025' in light blue.