It’s all turned sour: No spilled milk for Oatly - only spilled oat-based drink

Eleanor Coates

Bowl of rolled oats, a wooden spoon with oats, and a bottle and glass of milk on a blue wooden surface.

A final decision in the long-running dispute between Oatly AB, the owner of the OATLY plant-based drink, and Dairy UK Ltd, representing the interests of the dairy industry in the UK, was issued this week from the UK Supreme Court. 

This has been an ongoing dispute we last reported on in May 2024, when Oatly was successful in the earlier High Court decision in being allowed to register “POST MILK GENERATION” as a trade mark for oat drinks, which Dairy UK objected to, appealed and won such that the registration is not now allowed.

Can plant-based brands use protected dairy terms?

The issue centres on what type of use can be made of a protected term and the extent it can be used to brand or promote a product which does not fall under the protection. Dairy UK had a solid foundation for its objection. EU Regulation 1308/2013 (transposed into UK law) sets out rules around the usage of a variety of agricultural products such as “milk” or “butter”.   The Regulation specifically stipulates that the term may only be used for products made exclusively from animal milk.   

Further EU trade mark case law had followed and supported the Regulation, and brand owners in the UK seeking registration of a mark incorporating the word “MILK” for non-animal milk products could expect to receive an objection to registration from the UKIPO based on Section 3(4) on the basis of being a protected term.  The UK Trade Marks Act does not allow brand owners to register any mark where its use would be contrary to the legislation protecting reserved terminology, and similar restrictions apply to geographical indications, which reserve certain naming rights for a particular product from a defined region.    

It could therefore have been said to be surprising when the High Court opted to allow Oatly to register “POST MILK GENERATION” for oat-based drinks, with its reasoning that the mark was not being used to promote or sell milk products, but aimed at consumers who do not drink animal-based milk.

Oatly’s argument: marketing to the ‘post-milk’ generation

Clearly, for Oatly, who is trying to educate consumers to think of its product as an alternative or substitute for milk, benefits substantially from creating the impression that its product is a “milk-type” product.   How else to readily inform consumers in two words that its product has a similar texture and consistency, and can be used in the same way as milk can?

The UK Supreme Court has overturned the earlier High Court decision and clarified that the law’s reference to a “designation” refers to the use of the protected terms in relation to any marketing of food or drink, not just as an actual brand name for the product.  

Therefore, it does not matter if the product is branded under a different name, is aimed at those who do not drink milk or how they would understand the reference – the reference of the protected term in relation to that non-conforming product can, and should be, prevented.    

If the term is protected, then it can only be used in relation to the products set out in that protection, in this case, milk means animal milk, and it should not be used to promote plant-based alternative products. 

Supreme Court draws a clear line on protected terms

The case highlights that brand owners in the plant-based product industry, producing goods intended as substitutes to dairy products, cannot take advantage of the animal equivalent product generic names to inform and promote their products to consumers – milk, cream, yoghurt, butter and cheese can only be used to promote products made with animal milk.  

The UK Supreme Court’s decision illustrates that the UK will be strict in applying the protection given to such protected terms or geographical indicators and is not seeking to deviate from EU law. Instead, protected terms of an industry sector, such as dairy, will be celebrated and preserved. 

The takeaway for marketing teams of alternative plant-based products – they cannot stray into category borrowing of the existing animal-based sector and need instead to focus on the creation of their own sector terminology.    

If you would like advice on trade mark strategy or product branding in the food and drink sector, our specialist team can help, get in touch today.

The Financial Times logo featuring large "FT" initials above the words "FINANCIAL TIMES" on a beige background.
"IP STARS logo with text in dark blue and yellow, featuring a star symbol within the text, set against a plain background."
The word Legado500 in a large, elegant serif font with black lettering on a transparent background.
The IAM 300 logo features bold red and black text with a stylised red graphic element on a white background.
Three red rounded bars on the left and a large red M on the right against a black background.
A certificate with a grey background, displaying a score of 1000, awarded to Murgitroyd, recommended firm for 2025, featuring the IAM logo and bold text.
WTR 1000 logo in various shades of blue, gold, and black, with a geometric design and text on a transparent background.
The image displays the Lexology Client and Industry News logo with a pattern of dark circles and the words "LEXOLOGY" and "INDUSTRY NEWS".
A round badge with a white interior and gold border, featuring a gold eagle emblem, Chinese characters on a red ribbon, and the text "2024" at the bottom.
Logo of DéCIDEURS MAGAZINE featuring three shooting stars inside a circle and the magazine name in bold black and red text.
WIPR 2024 logo highlighting Diversity, with the tagline "Influential Woman in IP" on a teal background.
The Legal Benchmarking Social Impact Awards 2024 logo features a purple circle with "LBG" and bold black text to the right.
A colourful four-petal flower logo with a dark circle in the centre, accompanied by the text "IP INCLUSIVE" and the tagline "Working for diversity and inclusion in IP".
A colourful abstract logo with interconnected circles and the text "ADAPT.legal" underneath, set against a dark grey background.
European Patent Pipeline Program logo with the acronym "EPPP" in large pink letters above the full name in smaller dark blue text.
LSA logo with green text and leaf design, accompanied by black text reading "Legal Sustainability Alliance" and "Member | 2024".
A close-up of a cybersecurity badge featuring a blue background, green check mark, and the words "Cyber Essentials Certified."
A Cyber Essentials Plus logo featuring a blue and green circular emblem with a tick mark, accompanied by the text "CYBER ESSENTIALS PLUS".
The logo features the word "oveda" with a stylised, multicoloured swoosh design and the slogan “Invested in a better future” underneath.
Green and black logo featuring a stylised globe with wavy lines and the text "United Kingdom Best Managed Companies" beside it.
WIPO Rankings logo with "Highly Recommended Firm" and "UK Patents 2025" text in a mix of dark blue, light blue, and gold colours.